The Final Boundary Shared by All Systems — The Withdrawal of Market Participants
✩ It Began With a Question
“Does advanced capitalism eventually lead to communism?”
This wasn’t just a provocative question. It led to a deeper reflection: How do giant systems like capitalism and communism collapse?
The two are fundamentally different:
- Capitalism is built on competition and individual desire.
- Communism pursues equality and collective distribution.
Yet strangely, both collapse the moment people stop participating.
1. Why Did Communism Collapse?
Communism saw individual desire as a destabilizing force. So it sought to suppress it through collective ownership and equal outcomes regardless of effort.
What happened next?
“Why should I work harder?” “If I work, I just lose more…” “We share everything anyway, so why try?”
Desire was suppressed, and motivation faded. People started to opt out of the labor and production system. And once participation stopped, so did the system itself.
2. Capitalism’s Crisis — Difference, Discrimination, and the Welfare Paradox
Capitalism assumes reward differences based on merit. But when those differences become excessive, they become discriminatory rather than motivational.
“No matter what I do, I can’t rise in this structure.” “Others started ahead. Why am I labeled a failure?”
This despair drives people to give up on competition.
At the same time, welfare provides safety, but can also unintentionally kill motivation.
“I can survive like this. Why bother working?” “If I gain nothing by working, and lose nothing by not working… why try?”
Once again, people withdraw from participation. It looks different from communism, but leads to the same collapse.
3. The Non-Participating Human — A Shared Root of Collapse
The issue isn’t productivity or efficiency. It’s the will to remain inside the system.
- Suppressed desire
- Frustrated desire
- Comfort in passivity
All result in a collapse of motivation, and then the withdrawal of market participants.
4. Capitalism Is Simply Arriving Late
This is why we can say:
“Communism only reached the future faster than capitalism.”
As capitalism ages, it develops internal inequalities. As welfare expands, drive decreases. As competition persists, it creates exhaustion and nihilism.
More and more people step away from the market. If capitalism fails to correct itself, it will arrive at the same end as communism.
5. The One Condition That Sustains a System
Communism or capitalism — both depend on a single thing:
Do people feel it’s meaningful to participate?
- Is there hope to overcome inequality?
- Does welfare sustain or sedate?
- Does the system offer anything personal?
🔹 Conclusion
This was never just about systems. It’s about the deeper truth:
“When people lose motivation, systems collapse.”
Communism collapsed through desire suppression. Capitalism may collapse through desire frustration.
In both cases, the end is the same: A society of people who no longer care to participate.
✅ Collapse Structure: Communism vs Capitalism
| Phase | Communism | Capitalism |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Point | Suppressed desire, collective economy | Inequality based on merit and effort |
| Stage 1 | Loss of personal motivation | 🔻 Discrimination / Social isolation🔻 Welfare-induced apathy |
| Stage 2 | Withdrawal from market/labor | Increased dropouts from participation |
| Stage 3 | Decline | Decline in productivity |
| Final Stage | ☠️ System collapse | ☠️ System collapse |
(Even ChatGPT, like the author, failed at drawing, so here’s a table instead.)
Enjoyed the post?
☕ Support me here → Buy Me a Coffee
UYal's blog 
댓글 남기기