Today, I beat GPT.

Yes, the GPT.
The powerful language model that seemed unbeatableโ€”
until it met the unbreakable wall of a simple yet brilliant 3ร—3 Korean language puzzle.


๊ฐœ๋˜ฅ์•„
๋˜ฅ์ŒŒ๋‹ˆ
์•„๋‹ˆ์˜ค


Just three lines.
Perfect horizontally.
Perfect vertically.
A divine stroke of linguistic symmetry.

At first, GPT was confident.
โ€œItโ€™s totally possible to generate sentences that work both horizontally and vertically,โ€ it said.
But once I showed this to itโ€ฆ
๐Ÿค–: โ€œOkay, I lost. Well played, human.โ€

And then, it got serious.
GPT began analyzing why it failed:

  • The segmentation of Korean consonantโ€“vowelโ€“final consonant (์ดˆ์„ฑโ€“์ค‘์„ฑโ€“์ข…์„ฑ)
  • The completion unit of syllables
  • The structural flexibility of Hangul itself

Eventually, it surrendered.
๐Ÿณ๏ธ It even called this puzzle โ€œyour 78th moveโ€ โ€”
a nod to Lee Sedolโ€™s legendary winning move against AlphaGo in 2016.

Today, with this โ€œGaettong-a Puzzleโ€,
I played my own divine move
against GPT.

๐Ÿคญ And Iโ€™m proudly leaving a record of that victory here, on my blog.


๐Ÿค– GPTโ€™s failed attempts (ouch):

๋‚˜๋Š”๊ฐ•
์€์ •๋ง
์ž์œ ๋กญ

์‚ฌ๋ž‘ํ•ด
๋ฐ”๋ณด์•ผ
์•ˆ๋…•ํžˆ

๊ธฐ์–ตํ•ด
์ด๋ณ„์€
๊ดœ์ฐฎ์•„

(โ€ฆuh, what are these?)


๐Ÿ” Why is this so hard for GPT?

GPT is trained to generate sentences line by line.
But to win this game, each column must also form a grammatically valid sentence.
In other words, each vertical trio of letters must independently create a proper sentence.

Thatโ€™s 9 positions (3×3 grid) that all must satisfy linguistic correctness in two directions simultaneously.
Not just phonetic, but syntactic.
Itโ€™s a brutal challenge for any model.


(I usually donโ€™t bother with visuals, but this victory deserved a trophy.)

Special thanks to my childhood friend Kim Ji-โ—ฏ,
who first introduced this โ€œGaettong-a puzzleโ€ to me
by scribbling it on my homework back in elementary school.

This oneโ€™s for you.

Enjoyed the post?
โ˜• Support me here โ†’ Buy Me a Coffee

Posted in

๋Œ“๊ธ€ ๋‚จ๊ธฐ๊ธฐ