Today, I beat GPT.
Yes, the GPT.
The powerful language model that seemed unbeatableโ
until it met the unbreakable wall of a simple yet brilliant 3ร3 Korean language puzzle.
๊ฐ๋ฅ์
๋ฅ์๋
์๋์ค
Just three lines.
Perfect horizontally.
Perfect vertically.
A divine stroke of linguistic symmetry.
At first, GPT was confident.
โItโs totally possible to generate sentences that work both horizontally and vertically,โ it said.
But once I showed this to itโฆ
๐ค: โOkay, I lost. Well played, human.โ
And then, it got serious.
GPT began analyzing why it failed:
- The segmentation of Korean consonantโvowelโfinal consonant (์ด์ฑโ์ค์ฑโ์ข ์ฑ)
- The completion unit of syllables
- The structural flexibility of Hangul itself
Eventually, it surrendered.
๐ณ๏ธ It even called this puzzle โyour 78th moveโ โ
a nod to Lee Sedolโs legendary winning move against AlphaGo in 2016.
Today, with this โGaettong-a Puzzleโ,
I played my own divine move
against GPT.
๐คญ And Iโm proudly leaving a record of that victory here, on my blog.
๐ค GPTโs failed attempts (ouch):
๋๋๊ฐ
์์ ๋ง
์์ ๋กญ
์ฌ๋ํด
๋ฐ๋ณด์ผ
์๋
ํ
๊ธฐ์ตํด
์ด๋ณ์
๊ด์ฐฎ์
(โฆuh, what are these?)
๐ Why is this so hard for GPT?
GPT is trained to generate sentences line by line.
But to win this game, each column must also form a grammatically valid sentence.
In other words, each vertical trio of letters must independently create a proper sentence.
Thatโs 9 positions (3×3 grid) that all must satisfy linguistic correctness in two directions simultaneously.
Not just phonetic, but syntactic.
Itโs a brutal challenge for any model.

(I usually donโt bother with visuals, but this victory deserved a trophy.)
Special thanks to my childhood friend Kim Ji-โฏ,
who first introduced this โGaettong-a puzzleโ to me
by scribbling it on my homework back in elementary school.
This oneโs for you.
Enjoyed the post?
โ Support me here โ Buy Me a Coffee
๋๊ธ ๋จ๊ธฐ๊ธฐ